Category Archives: Politics

The Politics of the Tragic Charleston Church Shooting

It pains me to feel even the need to write this entry. I must apologize to the families grieving in Charleston right now; not for anything I’ve done or am about to say, but for the fact that we are living in a time where now what follows, an entry about politics after the very tragedy they haven’t buried their loved ones from yet, is being written. Funeral arrangements aren’t even finalized for some of these victims, but due to comments from the President, Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton, and others in the gun grabbing camp, this tragedy will not go to waste in the interest of curbing our Second Amendment Rights.

The politics post Charleston church shooting had been predictable all along, from the first MSNBC rant about guns to the very comments from Obama claiming “more advanced countries don’t have this problem,” doubled down by Hillary calling for Gun Control at her most recent campaign event. The commentators are making the same baseless claims that Americans want more gun control. Their branding the issue with blatant propaganda and feeding said blatant propaganda through the air waves, day after day, have caused a small group of pro gun grabbing policies activists to believe that, you guessed it, more Americans want gun control.

Lets take the gun control debate out of the equation and define just what exactly gun control is and what it aims to do.

Political power grows from the barrel of a gun. It’s a statement once used by I think Mao, but it’s true. The founding fathers here wrote the Bill of Rights in such a way that after expressly announcing there would be freedom of speech and religion, there would also be the decree that the right to bear arms is necessary to the safety and security of a free society, and that right shall not be infringed. There they are, Amendments 1 and 2, and they are ordered that way for a reason.

That reason is simple. He who wields the pen against his government when writing to congress about a controversial issue cannot be imprisoned for his controversial letter, or stance. The possible penalty for imprisoning him, remembering that imprisoning him for the contents of political speech sent to congress would effectively be tyranny as we are not talking about reacting to a bomb threat here, but reacting to routine free speech. Also He bears arms. He is a member of arms bearing society. If his right to speech is silenced, the right for everyone left to pursue his silencers is in stone.

Thats exactly why we have the second amendment. So what is gun control?

Gun control is, by using the same example above of a citizen writing a letter to congress on a controversial political subject being immune to persecution for his viewpoints backed by his right to bear arms to prevent the loss of his right to free speech, the idea that the government can in fact punish him for his viewpoints because his weapons have been stripped from him, his speech is now subject to what is acceptable to society as he knows it according to socialites and politicians he may not know.

In simplest terms, gun control is the beginning of the left’s move to assert total control. While the agenda of US Gun Grabbers may not rise to the same agendas used by Hitler, Stalin, The Japanese, or even certain Americans at Wounded Knee. If you don’t know, Wounded Knee was a result of American gun control in the earliest days. The women and children had given up their guns and, in the one room school of the Indian reservation, were shot by US soldiers.

Total control to the left may not mean herding women and children into the church at Wounded Knee, but whatever it does mean, we are unfortunately left to find out after the gun control processes Post Charleston’s gun free zoned Church mass shooting begin.

So on the way to total control they will propose new controls. Those will include forcing background checks on family members doing gifted guns. They’ll include forcing a gun registration system that, when total control can be implemented, proves to be the database used to attempt disarmament. I think I need not elaborate as to why I wrote “attempt” disarmament.

Again, to the families of the victims of Charleston’s shooting, I pray for you and apologize for finding the need so shortly after your tragedy to write this. The media unfortunately picked the time frame, and so did the presidential candidates.

In the wake of Charleston, or any other tragedy, the left should learn that first, the bodies of the dead should be allowed burial. Second, our gun rights are not simple privileges you can license and regulate like driving. Third, stop standing on and using the graves of these dead children, grandparents, and parents to heighten your unpopular agenda of disarmament.

We will not comply. We will not give up our rifles or pistols willingly. We will stand for nothing more and nothing less than simple enforcement of current laws. There is already a national background checks system. There are already rules on substance dependency and guns. Stop trying to break it to fix it, it’s simply not broken. Guns aren’t the problem, they are our protection from the very types who would be so bold as to try and take them.

March 16th is National 2A Protest Day

BATFE has overreached yet again, using the flawed “sporting purpose” test, to attempt a ban on common ammunition. In this case, the cheap plinking M855 .223/5.56 round is on the chopping block and the public only has until March 16th to stop them.

There is a growing movement on Twitter calling for nationwide protests on March 16th. We, the more than one hundred million gun owners of America, must take to the streets on this day and let not only ATF know how we feel, but show the entire country that we will no longer stand for the gun grabbing agenda of this Administration or its bureaucracy.  In the meantime, the NRA-ILA article on this matter has instructions on how to comment. Kindly let them know how you feel about their unconstitutional direct infringement on our second amendment and the subsequent increase in cost  of ammunition.

The most important message we can send on that day, aside from the fact that ATF should be a convenience store and not a powerful law enforcement agency above the very laws it regulates, is that we will no longer stand idly by while politicians exploit tragedies and find loopholes to heighten their unpopular anti gun agenda.

Spread the word to your friends in every major city. Make arrangements to take the day off. Draw up signs that say things like “Don’t ban ammunition, Ban The ATF”. Where legal, open carry if you’d like. But be mindful of whether your actions do anything to help our message in the eyes of a virtually state run liberal media.

Take our message directly to the nations capital and picket the White House, ATF building, and Congress in the Capitol  itself. We are 100 million strong. The Constitution is on our side. It is time we act like it.

The tree of liberty was once a beautiful, flourishing tree of life. Today it stands with barren branches extending over fallen leaves. On those very branches are carvings like “NFA 1934,” “GCA 1968,” “Oct. 1986,” “AWB 1994,” “NDAA,” “Obama Administration,” and the beginning of the carving “ammunition.” We need not water our tree in blood, nor are we calling on anyone to act violently on March 16th. Simply showing up in numbers indicative of just how many of us there are should show people like the President, Michael Bloomberg, and everyone else who seeks to take our rights away that it’s not just the NRA they are fighting on this issue, but the very people who allow them to hold power.

On March 16th let every city in America, and especially Washington, catch the eyes of the world while we, the shining beacon of freedom, use our First Amendment rights in the name of maintaining the Second Amendment. Without our Second Amendment protecting us in the unlikely event we may ever need water liberty’s tree with patriotic blood, the First Amendment is nothing but a lost fragment to a crumpled and shredded constitution.

Defeating ISIS By Christmas

Frankly,  to put it bluntly, the Obama Administration is a defeatist, pussified regime that has no grasp on how or when to conduct a war. Never has there been a greater threat to homeland security than a President who fails to acknowledge, through Eric Holder’s “not at war” statement today, not only that we are in a state of war, but with whom and what we are fighting. The President’s requested Congressional Authorization to deal with ISIS is too little, and too late.

Flag of the Islamic State
ISIS Flag, the flag of Islamic Extremism.

The way to defeat ISIS requires doing what the State Department spokeswoman said on Hardball last night that we can’t do, and that’s kill them. Daily air and drone strikes by no means are enough to defeat this self proclaimed Caliphate or it’s ideology. The Islamic Extremists, take note Washington, that is what they are called, want us to put boots on the ground. That’s exactly what we need to do, except we need to do it in a way they are neither expecting nor can use to gain recruits.

The Egyptian President is calling for an international coalition to defeat the Libyan chapter of ISIS. That is exactly what we need, except on all three fronts. Currently, the war is being conducted from Libya, Syria-Iraq, and Yemen. There is a way to win on all three by Christmas.

Libyan Front 

The CIA trained the group that inevitably not only attacked Benghazi, but became Libyan ISIS in the months before the end of the Qadafi regime from Libya’s western mountains. Therefore, we most likely already have decent intelligence as to who they are. By coordinating air and drone strikes with the Egyptian Air Force, we can easily soften the group before an invasion. If Egypt is willing to commit 50,000 troops, Libyan ISIS can be defeated by a coordinated invasion from the border while two Marine Expeditionary Units land on and around the shores of Benghazi. Libyan ISIS mainly operates in the east, therefore that is where the brunt of the ground troops should be. City by city, Marines from the Northwest can form a pincer around ISIS with Egyptian forces from the east. A third expeditionary unit can be on standby to land in Tripoli should intelligence indicate a need. Upon defeating Libyan ISIS, rebuilding will be left to Egypt and the Arab League. Marines would immediately come home.

Iraq-Syrian Front

Again, America cannot be the only army on Arab soil to prevent ISIS from gaining recruits under the propaganda of a crusader invasion. Currently, Iraqi ISIS is at war with the Kurdish Peshmerga and what is left of the Iraqi Army. 80,000 troops from the US, coordinating with the Kurds from the North and Iraqis from the east, can begin retaking Iraqi cities such as Fallujah and of equal importance, Al Baghdadi, which is just miles from a Marine unit charged with training the Iraqi Army. Meanwhile, the Arab Army from Jordan can push into Syria along with the help of Syrian Kurds, and American units from the originally proposed number of 80,000.

The Assad Regime and Iranian backed Hezbollah are too busy with Aleppo and holding Damascus to become engaged with defeating ISIS, however, in the interest of staying out of their civil war, after liberating ISIS held territory in Syria and flattening their self proclaimed capital of Raqqa to 6th century rubble, coalition forces can leave the region in the hands of whoever is in position to take it. Like Libya, rebuilding would be the job of the Arab League and not the responsibility of the US Military, who would withdraw as soon as the defeat is finalized.

Yemen 

While not technically ISIS, AQAP is affiliated with the group as evidenced by the ties of the Charlie Hebdo-Kosher Market attacks. Currently, Yemen is falling to Iranian backed Shi’ite rebels. AQAP, however, remains dug in from Aden to the northern areas of the country. Three Marine Expeditionary Units coordinating with a Saudi push from the north could easily sweep in by landing in Aden and pushing north. Camp by camp and town by town, Muslim forces along with American soldiers can drive AQAP/ISIS out of Yemen in a matter of months, again leaving rebuilding to the Arab forces from the Arab League.

Sixty percent of the American people do not like how the President is conducting the war. Another fifty percent don’t want ground troops to enter the war. People need to realize they can’t have their cake and eat it too. ISIS can easily be defeated, we simply have to recognize we are at war, who we are fighting, and that it will require careful coordination on the ground on each front to win it.

President Obama needs to simply get off of his own high horse and get our forces into the fight. He needs to do this with all deliberate speed before ISIS grows in power and territory, and most importantly, before more Christians and Jews are beheaded in  the name of a god that condones no such behavior. Islamic Extremism must be shown as a failed ideology by being defeated by the combined efforts of America and regional Muslim militaries. If Obama had the balls to strike today, our troops could easily be back on time for Christmas.

 

Israel’s July (or summer) War in Gaza

Rocket fragment in my aunts yard, Ramat Gan Israel.
Rocket fragment in my aunts yard, Ramat Gan Israel.

The State of Israel is in a constant state of war with its Hamas governed neighbors in the Gaza Strip. Hamas has demonstrated the use of a Vietcong type tunnel system and further guerrilla tactics to inflict nearly two dozen casualties on the IDF.

On Friday, my family in Ramat Gan, a suburb of Tel Aviv awoke to shrapnel from a Hamas rocket in their front yard. Per proper procedure, despite it being a chunk of metal, the bomb squad still had to remove it. Fortunately, nobody was hurt.

This is the reality people live with in Israel. Those who condone Hamas’ guerrilla tactics are nothing short of rabid dogs with no perspective or respect of life.  To quote Netanyahu, “We protect our civilians from rockets. Hamas protects its rockets with civilians.” Imagine if you had rockets from a border country landing in your yard; I firmly believe you would demand military action against the aggressor.

Anti-Semitism Rising in Media, Globe

Another disturbing trend as a result of the July (maybe summer) War is a rise of Anti Jewish media coverage by the MSM and comedy personalities. Jon Stewart was a recent comedic example, but the worst offenders are CNN and MSNBC interviewing people like Barghouti and promoting their Hamas propaganda.

In Boston, pro-Palestinian counter protestors disrupted a pro Israel March requiring the police to intervene on behalf of the Israel side. The protestors, many Jewish, reported racial slurs, spit in their eyes, and rock throwing from the terrorist side.

Celebrities are also taking the terrorist side, with Rhianna feverishly tweeting “Free Palestine!” Celebrities tend to always side with Hamas, with a few exceptions.

In Summary: Conduct of War, Gaza Solution, Palestine is Jordan

The IDF must conduct the war by whatever means necessary to end the rocket fire and tunneling by Hamas. The 2005 unilateral withdrawal, an olive branch from the Ariel Sharon Administration, is a failure. Israel must implement a different solution for Gaza after winning back the peace.

Gaza should be turned into the Playa del Carmen of the Arab World. Doing so is not far fetched, putting Hamas out of the picture. With a little cooperation from residents and the Palestinian Authority (in lieu of a constant occupation force), Egyptian contracting firms can come in, hire Palestinian workers, and build hotels and other tourist attractions while the government strengthens the infrastructure. All of this under the premise of demilitarized self rule with defense guaranteed by Israel and possibly later on, Egypt.

Unlike the West Bank, who’s Arab residents that refuse Israeli citizenship are de facto Jordanians, Gaza is formerly Egyptian territory. Gaza in the future could be stabilized and returned to Egypt by referendum, or join Israel under Israeli Arab citizenship.

The West Bank, the only viable place to create another state, has been Israeli territory since taking it from Jordan in 1967. Its citizens were Jordanian then and are Jordanian now. The mandate to create Israel and Palestine is therefore a success as there are two states divided by the river.

Jordan is the Palestinian State, a position I have always advocated as 87% of them are ethnic Palestinians including the Queen, and anyone who wishes to live in Arab-Palestine should thus move to Jordan. Israel can easily subsidize the cost if needed, and there is no price too expensive for a guaranteed peace.